PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • "Both in public opinion and the realm of the social sciences a common definition of populism is absent. The concept of populism has been used to refer to such a variety of phenomena, that it is more than problematical for undertaking comparative analysis. In this paper I discuss different methodological approaches to define populism and I argue that a minimal concept of populism is the most fruitful approach to develop a comparative research agenda. To show this, I compare the minimal definitions developed by Kurt Weyland (populism as a political strategy) and Cas Mudde (populism as a thin-centered ideology). Moreover, I explain why Mudde's definition should be the starting point for a comparative research agenda on populism. To conclude, I show that this minimal definition is helpful for analyzing the ambivalent relationship between populism and democracy." (author's abstract) (xsd:string)
?:citation
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • de (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1612-9008 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
?:name
  • Skizze einer vergleichenden Forschungsagenda zum Populismus (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Totalitarismus und Demokratie, 8, 2011, 2, 251-271 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-326287 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 8 (xsd:string)