PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • In four studies, the authors investigated the individual-oriented versus social-oriented nature of procedural justice effects by comparing fairness-based responses to decision-making procedures among proself versus prosocial oriented individuals. In Studies 1 through 3, we measured participants' social value orientation and manipulated whether or not they were granted or denied voice in a decision-making process. Results consistently revealed that the effects of voice versus no-voice on fairness-based perceptions, emotions, and behavioral intentions were significantly more pronounced for individuals with proself orientations than for individuals with prosocial orientations. These findings were extended in Study 4, a field study in which perceived procedural justice was a stronger predictor of satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors among proselfs than among prosocials. These findings suggest that procedural justice effects can be accounted for by self-oriented motives or needs, rather than prosocial motives that are often conceptualized as being associated with justice. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 5 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The egocentric nature of procedural justice: social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 2008, 5, 1303-1315 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-262881 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 44 (xsd:string)