PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • In two studies it is demonstrated that two self-saliency manipulations, often used interchangeably, can have profoundly different consequences. Whereas self-activation increased stereotyping in highly prejudiced participants, a mirror decreased stereotyping. Results show that this difference can be ascribed to the activation of specific self-aspects. Whereas a mirror increased both private and public self-awareness (and, hence, awareness of the social norm that stereotyping is bad), self-activation increased private self-awareness exclusively (and, hence, awareness of privately held negative stereotypes). The implications of these findings for the relation between self-awareness and conformity to social norms are discussed. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.005 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 4 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The Mirror and I: when private opinions are in conflict with public norms (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 2008, 4, 1160-1166 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-253062 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 44 (xsd:string)