PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • How do subnational authoritarian enclaves emerge (or survive) ina democratic transition at the federal level? How can they endure large-scalesocial protests, like the one that shook Oaxaca in 2006? While federal tolerancefor subnational authoritarian practices is a necessary condition, it isinsufficient in itself to explain why subnational political systems sustain andeventually reproduce authoritarian practices in the first place. In this article,therefore, I focus on the internal dimension of subnational authoritarianism.I argue that, because of its reliance on two distinct sources of legitimacy,Oaxaca’s neo-patrimonial domination system was able to respond to theformal democratizing pressures emanating from the federal transition withoutlosing its authoritarian nature. This process of hybridization transformedOaxacan institutions, but left social structures and the political dynamics thatemerge from them – the sources of subnational authoritarianism – almostintact. By exploring the evolution of neo-patrimonialism and hybridizationin Oaxaca from a theoretical perspective, I address the issues of change andcontinuity in the emergence of subnational authoritarian enclaves, in Mexicoand elsewhere. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2010 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1868-4890 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Neo-patrimonialism and subnational authoritarianism in Mexico: the case of Oaxaca (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2, 2010, 2, 85-112 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-2764 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)