PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • The article dismisses most of the objections previously forwarded in this journal by Khandakar Qudrat-I Elahi against Amartya Sen's framework for famine analysis: the entitlement approach. Instead, the article argues that even thirty years after the conception of the entitlement approach, it remains a potent framework for famine analysis, as illustrated by the recent 2005 famine. However, as contemporary famines are increasingly linked to factors that have hitherto received limited attention in entitlement analysis – conflicts, legal collapses and political struggles – the article calls for supplementary famine analysis on the meso and macro levels. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2009 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2009 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1080/00220380802649947 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 4 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The entitlement approach – a case for framework development rather than demolition (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Journal of Development Studies, 45, 2009, 4, 621-640 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-134701 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 45 (xsd:string)