PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • In this article, we defend the thesis that geographical proximity remains essential for knowledge transfer, but not often implies the co-location of innovation and research activities. The need for geographical proximity now mostly affects certain stages of the process of production, research or development. Short or medium-term visits are often sufficient for the partners to exchange the information needed for cooperation. The mobility of individuals makes it possible to implement this mechanism. Temporary geographical proximity implies a strong relation to space but one that differs in nature from that described by the traditional approaches. (xsd:string)
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2008 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1080/00343400801922814 ()
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • en (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 6 (xsd:string)
?:linksDOI
?:linksURN
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Zeitschriftenartikel (xsd:string)
  • journal_article (en)
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-SSOAR (xsd:string)
  • In: Regional Studies, 42, 2008, 6, 869-889 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:urn
  • urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-133604 ()
?:volumeNumber
  • 42 (xsd:string)