PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • We aimed to evaluate the impact of two question wordings, one more directive (reference, European Social Survey) and one less directive (modified version), on self-reported trust. Using a randomly equivalent groups design, young adults (n = 1,681) from the EPITeen cohort completed one of two questionnaires to evaluate trust. The final score ranged between 0 (lowest) and 30 (highest). Cronbach’s alphas were computed to assess reliability, and invariance tests were conducted to test the equivalence of both versions. Lower levels of interpersonal trust were attained with the reference version [M (SD):14.4(5.3) vs. 15.6(4.8); p < .001 and p = .005 for mean and variance comparison]. The reference version had better reliability (a = .742 vs. .686; p = .006). Strict invariance was achieved between the two formats, and similar effects of sociodemographic variables on trust were obtained, independently of the version used. The reference version presented better reliability than the modified one, supporting its ability to measure levels of trust among young adults. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:contributor
?:hasFulltext
  • true (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • Englisch (EN) (xsd:string)
?:libraryLocation
?:linksLabel
  • Volltext (xsd:string)
?:name
  • The Influence of Question Wording on Interpersonal Trust : a Comparison in Randomly Equivalent Groups (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Buch (de)
  • Elektronische Ressource (xsd:string)
  • books (en)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-BIB (xsd:string)
  • In: Methodology, vol. 15(2019) no. 2 ; p. 56-66. ISSN 1614-1881 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url