PropertyValue
?:about
?:abstract
  • "... extensive quantitative case study of an article of the Harvard Law Review resulted in a devastating finding: only 1% of all correct references from the original article were indexed by SSCI without any mistake or error. Many scientific communication experts and database providers' believe that errors in databanks are of less importance: There are many errors, yes - but they would counterbalance each other, errors would not result in citation losses and would not bear any effect on retrieval and evaluation outcomes. Terje Tüür-Fröhlich claims the contrary: errors and inconsistencies are not evenly distributed but linked with languages biases and publication cultures. Thomson Reuters’ citation indexes i.e. SCI, SSCI and AHCI are said to be “authoritative”. Due to the huge influence of these databases on global academic evaluation of productivity and impact, Terje Tüür-Fröhlich decided to conduct case studies on the data quality of Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) records. ... " (Verlagsinformation) (xsd:string)
?:author
?:contributor
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:hasFulltext
  • false (xsd:boolean)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • Englisch (EN) (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:isbn
  • 9783864881046 ()
?:libraryLocation
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The non-trivial effects of trivial errors in scientific communication and evaluation (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • Buch (de)
  • Monographie (xsd:string)
  • book (en)
?:publisher
?:sourceInfo
  • GESIS-BIB (xsd:string)
  • Glückstadt: Hülsbusch, 2016.- 164 S. (xsd:string)
rdf:type