PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • A quarter of a century ago the first series of European Parliament elections were characterised as second-order national elections. Much has changed since, which might have had an impact upon this diagnosis. In this article the central assumptions and predictions of the second-order elections model are restated and evaluated against the outcome of the 2004 European Parliament election and a post-election survey. Surprisingly enough, the findings confirm the persisting second-order nature of EP elections for Western Europe. Matters look very different, however, in the eight new Central and East European member countries. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (EES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • GESIS-Literaturpool (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2005 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2005 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1080/01402380500085962 ()
?:duplicate
?:fromPage
  • 650 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • english (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 3 (xsd:string)
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order? (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • article (xsd:string)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In West European Politics, 28(3), 650-679, 2005 (xsd:string)
?:studyComponent
  • Voter Study (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2005 (xsd:string)
  • EES (xsd:string)
  • EES_input2021 (xsd:string)
  • EES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • SCOPUSindexed (xsd:string)
  • SSCIindexed (xsd:string)
  • article (xsd:string)
  • corrected (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • imported (xsd:string)
  • indexproved (xsd:string)
  • review_proved (xsd:string)
  • reviewed (xsd:string)
  • voterstudy (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 679 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 28 (xsd:string)