PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • This paper does three things. It explores the importance of the phenomenon: how prominent a feature of political orientations are multiple PIDs? It then tests three institutional factors that might be conducive to multiple PIDs – the format of the party system, the electoral system, and the age of a democratic polity. It finally assesses the effect of single vs. multiple PIDs on vote choice. It shows (1) that multiple party identifications are of more than marginal fre-quency and importance; (2) that the limited electoral experience of voters in new democracies is the best predictor of multiple PIDs; and (3) that the behavioural consequences of multiple PIDs are comparatively low. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • CSES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2002 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2002 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:fromPage
  • 24 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Multiple Party Identifications (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
?:sourceCollection
  • Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems" (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems", 24, 2002 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2002 (xsd:string)
  • CSES (xsd:string)
  • CSES_input2014 (xsd:string)
  • CSES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
  • input2014 (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 24 (xsd:string)
rdf:type