PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Democratic representation and accountability presume that the programmatic choices offered by parties effectively address the concerns of mass publics. If voters do not believe that parties are able to redress those issues they deem central, it is hard to conclude that parties can be effective agents of representation. Curiously, however, students of party governments and representation research in advanced democracies rarely examine a key assumption of these mechanisms: do party programs offer solution that mass publics deem effective? In turn, how do competence attributions affect evaluations of the democratic process? (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • CSES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2016 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
is ?:hasPart of
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • “You are Fired”: How Voters Come to Believe that Party Systems are Incompetent (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
?:sourceCollection
  • American Polititcal Science Association (APSA) (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In American Polititcal Science Association (APSA), 2016 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2016 (xsd:string)
  • CSES (xsd:string)
  • CSES_input2018 (xsd:string)
  • CSES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
rdf:type