PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • “You live or die as a government in the economic field” opined former Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke. And while many studies of voter behaviour validate the idea of economic voting (e.g.: Lewis-Beck & Stegmaier 2013), the main critique remains that economic perceptions are highly contaminated by partisanship bias (e.g.: van der Brug, van der Eijk, & Franklin 2007) and thus economic assessments do not have any independent effect of their own. In this paper, we challenge the view that economic perceptions are endogenous and therefore subject to partisanship bias. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • CSES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2017 (xsd:gyear)
is ?:hasPart of
?:name
  • Contamination in Reverse: The Pandora’s Box of Partisanship and Economic Voting during the Global Financial Crisis (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
?:sourceCollection
  • General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR), 2017 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2017 (xsd:string)
  • CSES (xsd:string)
  • CSES_input2018 (xsd:string)
  • CSES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
rdf:type