PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Purpose: Political participation has been identified as a predictor of mental health. Previous research studies have reported mixed results concerning the relationship between political participation and mental health. Moreover, findings have generally been confined to the between-individual level. The few studies that investigated within-person associations have not examined bidirectionality. In the current study, the bidirectional relationship between political participation and mental health was investigated. Methods: Data from the GESIS Panel study were used to assess the bidirectional association between political participation and mental health. The GESIS Panel study is a probability-based panel representative of the German-speaking population residing in Germany and aged between 18 and 70 years (M = 44.52; SD = 14.67; 52 percent female participants). Mental health was assessed using measures of depression symptoms and subjective well-being. Results: Using up to nine waves of longitudinal survey data, a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model indicated little evidence for cross-lagged effects from political participation to mental health or vice versa. Notwithstanding, few significant cross-lagged paths were observed. Conclusions: Overall, the findings were not consistent with the theorized effect of political participation on mental health. Moreover, there is little evidence that mental health affects political participation. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:citation
?:comment
  • (GESIS Panel) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • GESIS Panel-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2024 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2024 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1111/ssqu.13440 ()
?:fromPage
  • 1751 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • english (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 1540-6237 ()
?:issueNumber
  • 5 (xsd:string)
?:name
  • The reciprocal relationship between political participation and mental health in Germany: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • article (xsd:string)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In Social Science Quarterly, 105(5), 1751-1762, 2024 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • GESIS Panel (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2024 (xsd:string)
  • GESISpanel (xsd:string)
  • GP.pop (xsd:string)
  • GP.pop_input2024 (xsd:string)
  • GP.pop_pro (xsd:string)
  • SCOPUSindexed (xsd:string)
  • SSCIindexed (xsd:string)
  • ZA5665_zt (xsd:string)
  • article (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • indexproved (xsd:string)
  • review_proved (xsd:string)
  • transfer24 (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 1762 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 105 (xsd:string)