PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • In this paper, we develop a novel way of testing the stigmatization hypothesis. The stigmatization hypothesis argues that people who break traditional norms, experience sanctions from the people that surround them. We apply this hypothesis to the case of divorce and examine whether higher normative intolerance toward divorce in the region of residence lead to declines in social contacts after divorce. To test the hypothesis, we match data from the European Community Household Panel (ECHP) to data from the European Values Study (EVS). The ECHP data are used to model individual changes in social contacts after divorce. The EVS data are used to develop measures of individual attitudes against divorce in 65 European regions. Multilevel analyses are used to link the two, where individuals are nested in regions. The results provide partial confirmation for the stigmatization hypothesis. We first find that attitudes about divorce not only differ significantly between countries, they also differ significantly between regions within countries. Second, in regions where there is more disapproval of divorce, women experience greater declines in contacts with friends and relatives after divorce, men and women experience greater declines in neighborhood contacts, and men are more likely to end their club memberships. Third, we find that the stigmatization effect is primarily present for divorcees who did not move after divorce. Our analyses provide more direct evidence for the operation of social norms than previous studies on family behavior have done. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (EVS) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • EVS-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2007 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2007 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:fromPage
  • 447 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
?:isPartOf
?:issn
  • 0049089X ()
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Regional Value Differences in Europe and the Social Consequences of Divorce: A Test of the Stigmatization Hypothesis (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • article (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In Social Science Research, 36(2), 447-468, 2007 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • European Values Study (EVS) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2007 (xsd:string)
  • EVS (xsd:string)
  • EVS_input2014 (xsd:string)
  • EVS_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • SCOPUSindexed (xsd:string)
  • SSCIindexed (xsd:string)
  • article (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • indexproved (xsd:string)
  • input2014 (xsd:string)
  • moral_issues (xsd:string)
  • reviewed (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 468 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:volumeNumber
  • 36 (xsd:string)