PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • The argument that ethical pluralism requires new forms of governmental process to manage a changed consensus about fundamental societal values and norms rests on a key premiss that there really exists a pluralism of religious beliefs and ethical norms in modern societies. This chapter examines the evidence for this premiss, and concludes that while it does reveal a tendency towards increasing religious and ethical pluralism, the trend is by no means as universal as has often been suggested. Furthermore, it is ambiguous whether disparities between religious and ideological groups will assist or hinder democratic governability. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (EVS) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • EVS-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 1995 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 1995 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:editor
?:fromPage
  • 218 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
?:isbn
  • 0198279574, 0198294751 ()
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Religious and Ethical Pluralism (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • incollection (xsd:string)
?:publisher
?:sourceCollection
  • The Impact of Values (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In The Impact of Values, edited by van Deth, J W. and Scarbrough, Elinor, 218-249, Oxford University Press, 1995 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • European Values Study (EVS) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 1995 (xsd:string)
  • EVS (xsd:string)
  • EVS_input2014 (xsd:string)
  • EVS_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • incollection (xsd:string)
  • input2014 (xsd:string)
  • moral_issues (xsd:string)
  • religion (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 249 (xsd:string)
rdf:type