PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • This paper reviews Eurobarometer surveys from 1995 to 2010 and shows how Eurobarometer selects and frames questions in ways that systematically produce “integrationist” outcomes. The violations of the rules of good public opinion research concern incomprehensible, hypothetical, and knowledge-inadequate questions, unbalanced response options, insinuation and leading questions, context effects, and the strategic removal of questions that led to critical responses in previous Eurobarometer waves. It is highly unlikely that the violations happen unintentionally. Eurobarometer therefore blurs the line between research and propaganda. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • http://ssrn.com/abstract=2681038. (Eurobarometer) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • Eurobarometer-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2015 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2015 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
?:fromPage
  • 26 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
?:issueNumber
  • 15/6 (xsd:string)
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • How the Eurobarometer Blurs the Line between Research and Propaganda (xsd:string)
?:provider
?:publicationType
  • techreport (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • (15/6), 26, 2015 (xsd:string)
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2015 (xsd:string)
  • EB_input2016 (xsd:string)
  • EB_pro (xsd:string)
  • Eurobarometer (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • input2016 (xsd:string)
  • techreport (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 26 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url