PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • The conventional operationalisation of the concept of party identification is not appropriate for the multiparty setting. I offer new measures that facilitate multiple, and negative as well as positive, identities. Using survey evidence from Northern Ireland, these new measures are validated in a number of ways and their role in a comprehensive model of voting is illustrated. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (EES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • GESIS-Literaturpool (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2006 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2006 (xsd:gyear)
?:doi
  • 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.07.003 ()
?:duplicate
?:fromPage
  • 346 (xsd:string)
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • english (xsd:string)
?:isPartOf
?:issueNumber
  • 2 (xsd:string)
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Making `Party Identification' More Versatile: Operationalising the concept for the multiparty setting (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • article (xsd:string)
?:reference
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In Electoral Studies, 26(2), 346-358, 2006 (xsd:string)
?:studyComponent
  • Voter Study (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2006 (xsd:string)
  • EES (xsd:string)
  • EES_input2021 (xsd:string)
  • EES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • SCOPUSindexed (xsd:string)
  • SSCIindexed (xsd:string)
  • article (xsd:string)
  • corrected (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • imported (xsd:string)
  • indexproved (xsd:string)
  • review_proved (xsd:string)
  • reviewed (xsd:string)
  • voterstudy (xsd:string)
?:toPage
  • 358 (xsd:string)
rdf:type
?:url
?:volumeNumber
  • 26 (xsd:string)