PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Leaders have become the human face of election campaigns, while electorates have become dealigned. This has lead to the suggestion that in parliamentary elections many voters now vote for the party leader they like best in much the same way that in presidential elections they vote for the candidate they like best. This chapter uses the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems project data to assess whether there is any systematic evidence to support this expectation for either all or some parliamentary elections. While leadership evaluations are relatively more important in parliamentary elections that take place where a two-party system is in place, and where a majoritarian electoral system is used, they are still far less important than they are in presidential contests. Meanwhile, not all features of a dealigned electorate appear to be associated with a greater propensity to vote on the basis of leadership evaluations. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (CSES) (xsd:string)
  • http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers.htm (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • CSES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2006 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2006 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
is ?:hasPart of
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • The Impact of Leadership evaluations on voting behaviour: Do the rules matter? (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • techreport (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2006 (xsd:string)
  • CSES (xsd:string)
  • CSES_input2014 (xsd:string)
  • CSES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • input2014 (xsd:string)
  • techreport (xsd:string)
rdf:type