PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • In the last decade, the concept of populist voting has come to prominence in many electoral democracies. Current research on this topic has shown that populist attitudes are usually associated with populist party preferences. Yet, it is still unclear to what extent the electoral success of populist actors is due to voters’ populist considerations vis-à-vis other types of political attitudes. This paper aims at providing a first comparative assessment of this issue by relying on a simulation-based approach, estimating what would happen at the level of election outcomes in a country if populist attitudes had a more (or less) relevant role in voters’ decisions than they had in the 'real world'. Analyses rely on the 5th Module of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES), reworked in the so-called stacked form, meaning that the data is restructured in the form of ‘individual*parties’. Results show that parties generally recognized as populist owe only a small part of their success to populist attitudes. (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • CSES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateModified
  • 2022 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2022 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
is ?:hasPart of
?:inLanguage
  • english (xsd:string)
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Beyond Rhetoric: The Micro-Foundations of Populist Parties' Success (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
?:reference
?:sourceCollection
  • American Political Science Association (APSA) (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In American Political Science Association (APSA), 2022 (xsd:string)
?:studyGroup
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2022 (xsd:string)
  • CSES (xsd:string)
  • CSES_input2022 (xsd:string)
  • CSES_pro (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_IUP (xsd:string)
  • english (xsd:string)
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
  • transfer22 (xsd:string)
rdf:type