PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • While open-ended questions had been used in seminal works such as Stokes et al. (1958), Campbell et al. (1960), or Converse (1964), they have been largely ignored in electoral science ever since the 1980s. Currently, related to the discussion of voter heterogeneity, open-ended questions might experience a renaissance. The notion that voters apply different decision-making strategies when choosing among parties has become common sense in electoral science. Some voters, for example, are assumed to vote in order to achieve a certain policy-outcome, others may but put a special emphasis on candidates, and still another group may simply vote habitually. However, how to identify heterogeneous subgroups in the electorate is still unsettled. Bartle (2005) advocates that directly asking the voters about their considerations might be the most promising approach... (xsd:string)
?:author
?:comment
  • (GLES) (xsd:string)
?:dataSource
  • GLES-Bibliography (xsd:string)
?:dateCreated
  • 1. Fassung, April 2012 (xsd:gyear)
?:dateModified
  • 2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:datePublished
  • 2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:duplicate
is ?:hasPart of
is ?:mainEntity of
?:name
  • Can open-ended Questions help to identify Voter Heterogeneity? (xsd:string)
?:publicationType
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
?:reference
?:sourceCollection
  • Conference of the European Survey Research Assoiciation (ESRA) (xsd:string)
?:sourceInfo
  • Bibsonomy (xsd:string)
  • In Conference of the European Survey Research Assoiciation (ESRA), 2011 (xsd:string)
?:startDate
  • 18.07.-22.07.2011 (xsd:gyear)
?:studyGroup
  • German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) (xsd:string)
?:tags
  • 2011 (xsd:string)
  • FDZ_Wahlen (xsd:string)
  • GLES (xsd:string)
  • GLES_input2011 (xsd:string)
  • GLES_pro (xsd:string)
  • GLES_version1 (xsd:string)
  • ZA5302 (xsd:string)
  • checked (xsd:string)
  • inproceedings (xsd:string)
rdf:type