PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2015-10-15 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Did a Man Spitefully Paint His Lawn Like a Flag? (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • On 28 August 2015, a Facebook page shared the above reproduced photograph along with the claim that they told the man depicted in it that he could not fly an American flag (so he did the next best thing). Example: No information was provided about the individual seen in the photo, where the house/lawn was located, the circumstances under which he was purportedly prevented from flying an American flag, and by whom that edict was issued. In the absence of a named guilty party, many e-mails substituted a homeowners' association (HOA) as the presumptive villain. (A Reddit thread based on the post featured comments from folks who inferred that a homeowners' association was the flag-Grinch in the scenario, a conclusion similarly reached by Facebook commenters.) The same photograph was published to Reddit on 17 June 2014, but that iteration was titled Go big or go home and made no mention of flag banning. In fact, no description for the image was provided before it attracted the evil homeowners' association backstory — which may have been due to the photograph's age. The claim was nearly identical to a similar yarn about a man who painted his entire house to resemble an American flag after his homeowners' association allegedly prevented him from flying one. That display was also not a protest against folks who supposedly banned the American flag; and the resulting large flag art was not a clever jab at an oppressive HOA. An article from September 2001 (since archived and cached) accurately described the photograph: After this fact check was published, an employee of the Journal Gazette newspaper of Fort Wayne, Indiana, informed Snopes that the photograph, taken by Samuel Hoffman, was originally printed in that paper on Sept. 18, 2001 as part of a special section in response to the events of Sept. 11, 2001. The paper provided microfiche images of the issue: That caption reads: (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url