PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2021-11-21 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Waukesha SUV Incident: What's True, False About Suspect Darrell Brooks (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • In November 2021, rumors swirled online in the aftermath of a major incident in Waukesha, Wisconsin, in which an individual driving an SUV appeared to plow into crowds attending a Christmas parade, killing at least five people and injuring dozens. On the evening of Nov. 21, police officers said they had a person of interest in custody. The day after the incident, on Nov. 22, Waukesha Police Chief Daniel Thompson named him as Darrell E. Brooks, 39, a resident of Milwaukee, adding that authorities intended to charge him with five counts of first-degree intentional homicide. In the hours after the incident, social media platforms were already rife with various claims about the background and past convictions of Brooks. Below, we analyze a selection of the most significant and widely shared rumors about the alleged Christmas parade assailant, in the 24 hours after the fatal incident. This collection may be updated, if and when further significant claims or conspiracies emerge. True An example of posts making this claim can be found here. In May 2006, prosecutors in Washoe County, Nevada, charged Brooks with one count of statutory sexual seduction, a felony defined in Nevada law as sexual intercourse or penetration committed by a person 18 years of age or older with a person under the age of 16 years. The details of the case were not immediately available. However, we do know that it was elevated to the 2nd Judicial District Court, where Brooks went on to plead guilty as part of a plea agreement, in November 2006. NVSexOffenders.gov — an official Nevada Department of Public Safety database — lists Brooks as a non-compliant sex offender, a term for sex offenders who fail to initially register, fail to comply with verification or fail to update personal information; i.e., residential address, employment information, school information: In 2016, Washoe County prosecutors charged Brooks with violating Chapter 179.D.550 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, which requires convicted sex offenders to properly register with local law enforcement agencies, and to inform them of address changes. True Examples of that claim can be found here and here. On Nov. 5, prosecutors in Milwaukee County charged Brooks with several counts, including domestic abuse, battery, jumping bail, and resisting an officer: According to court records, Brooks had pleaded not guilty to those charges, and on Nov. 19, he posted his $1,000 bail bond. The next scheduled hearing in that case was set for Dec. 20, 2021. Therefore, it was accurate to state that Brooks was out on bail on unrelated charges, in Milwaukee County, at the time of the parade incident in nearby Waukesha. Unproven In the hours following the parade incident, the possible motivations of the individual driving the SUV in Waukesha were the subject of intensive online speculation, with some positing that the incident must have been an act of terrorism. However, several outlets indicated otherwise. For example, CNN reported that: Similarly, NBC News reported that: And on Nov. 22, The Washington Post wrote: At a follow-up news conference on Nov. 22, Waukesha Police Chief Thompson said Brooks was involved in a domestic disturbance just prior to the parade incident, and insisted there was no evidence this is a terrorist incident, and said his department had no information to suggest that Brooks knew anyone in the parade. The early indications from local law enforcement, both on and off the record, strongly suggested that Brooks had indeed been moving quickly away from the scene of an unrelated altercation and/or crime at the time of the Christmas parade incident. However, we have not yet seen underlying evidence linked to this specific claim, so we cannot yet reach a definitive conclusion on it. As a result, we are issuing a rating of Unproven on the claim for now. (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url