PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2012-10-15 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Joe Kyrillos said when he voted against minimum wage hike, it was in the 1980s (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • Republican U.S. Senate candidate Joe Kyrillos said he thinks the state’s lowest-paid workers deserve a raise. But incumbent U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez, a Democrat, accused Kyrillos of reversing course on that position. The two will face off in the Nov. 6 election. Listen, you had the opportunity, you know, you just can't flip back and forth. You've become the biggest flip flopper. Now it's that you want to vote for the minimum wage increase but you voted against it when you had the opportunity. Why'd you vote against it? Menendez said during a heated debate on New Jersey 101.5-FM on Wednesday night. I already said. You look at -- I think when I voted against it, it was in the 80s. It was a long time. You were in the Assembly then, Kyrillos said, adding that you look at things in the context of their times. You look at the legislation as it’s proposed. Let’s refresh Kyrillos’ memory here, because PolitiFact New Jersey didn’t have to go back to the 1980s to find a time when he voted against increasing the minimum wage. Kyrillos, a state senator from Monmouth County, voted against a 2005 proposal that boosted the minimum wage in two steps, eventually increasing it to $7.15 per hour in 2006. That rate didn’t change until 2009, when the federal minimum wage jumped to $7.25 per hour. When federal and state minimum wages conflict, the higher one applies, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. When we pointed out the 2005 vote to Kyrillos spokeswoman Meaghan Cronin she said Kyrillos has supported increasing the minimum wage and cited another 2005 bill that he sponsored. Two weeks after Kyrillos voted against the proposal that became law he introduced legislation that increased the minimum wage more, but at a slower pace. Under his bill, the minimum wage would increase in four stages, reaching $7.25 per hour on Aug. 1, 2008. That bill was referred to committee but never came to a vote. Still, Kyrillos is wrong to claim his vote against the minimum wage happened more than two decades ago, because he voted against it again less than 10 years ago. In fact, Kyrillos wasn’t even in office for much of the 1980s. He joined the Assembly in 1988 before winning a seat in the state Senate, where he has served since 1992. Then-assemblyman Kyrillos voted against a 1990 bill that hiked the minimum wage -- then set at $3.35 per hour -- in three phases, ultimately increasing it to an hourly rate of $5.05 in 1992. Menendez, who also served in the assembly at the time, voted in favor of the bill, according to assembly minutes. The assembly later voted again on the same measure after the senate amended the bill. On that second vote, Menendez again voted yes, while Kyrillos is not listed in the minutes as voting. By 1992 both Kyrillos and Menendez had joined the state senate. That year a bill was introduced to delay half of the final increase in the minimum wage hike approved two years earlier. Kyrillos voted in favor of that legislation, while Menendez opposed it. The governor vetoed the bill. Our ruling Kyrillos said, when I voted against [an increase in the minimum wage], it was in the 80s. Actually the state senator and Republican U.S. Senate hopeful voted against a bill in 2005 that eventually increased the minimum wage to $7.15 per hour. We rate this statement False. To comment on this ruling, go to NJ.com . (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url