PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2005-09-17 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Why Proofreading Makes Sense (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • Origins: In mid-September 2005 we began receiving copies of a PDF produced from faxed versions of court documents. Usually titled something like Why proofreading makes sense . . ., the e-mailed file contains no explanation, just a reproduction of two documents. The first document is a motion filed in Miami-Dade County Court in the matter of Davant Development Corp. vs. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc., with the plaintiff's requesting a continuance on the grounds that counsel for the plaintiff is recovering from dick surgery and because of continuing pain is unable to properly represent plaintiff in a trial. The second document reveals why no explanation is necessary: it's a letter from a physician stating that aforementioned counsel for the plaintiff is currently under his care and suffers from a Disk Herniation L4/L5 which does not allow him to sit for long periods of time. We don't know whether the goof was the result of a mishearing, a mistake in transcription, or an unfortunate typographical error, but it likely produced more than a few chuckles around the courthouse and some chagrined faces at the law firm of plaintiff's counsel. (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url