|
?:reviewBody
|
-
A new twist in the Republican case against the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups reignited some old claims about the ongoing controversy on this week’s Sunday political shows. Last week, House Republicans grilled IRS Commissioner John Koskinen about emails belonging to former IRS executive Lois Lerner that the agency now says were destroyed when her computer hard drive crashed. Republicans were incensed and said IRS’ explanation didn’t pass the smell test. But during a debate June 22, 2014 on CNN’s State of the Union , Democratic strategist Donna Brazile said that the most recent Republican outrage is just a distraction. The only lie here is to lie that I think conservatives are telling and saying that somehow another this was a conspiracy against conservatives, Brazile said. (The IRS) also investigated liberal groups, groups that have progressive in their name, groups that had Israel in its name. So the IRS was basically looking at everybody because they were trying to figure out where all of this fake, phony, secretive money was flowing in the last election cycle. Brazile is echoing comments Democrats have made for a year. But is she right and the IRS was basically looking at everybody? This question was essentially answered last year by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, who investigated the IRS’s handling of tax exempt requests between 2010 and 2012. The controversy starts with an IRS office in Cincinnati, Ohio, that is in charge of reviewing applications for tax-exempt status. Their process includes determining whether the organization is involved in political activities and whether that should impact their tax-exempt status. For example, nonprofit organizations that identify as a 501(c)(4) can engage in limited political campaign intervention, as long as its not their primary function, meaning, in part, that they can advocate for issues but not for candidates. In March 2010, this IRS office began looking at the tax exempt status of tea party groups. Ten tea party cases were identified and sent to a Washington office for greater scrutiny. IRS officials told investigators that tea party was used in the office as a catch-all phrase for groups engaging in political activity, and indeed not all 10 groups had tea party in their names. In August 2010, a formal Be on the Lookout list was created instructing staff to flag applications of tea party groups. In June 2011, the list was expanded to include the words Patriot and 9/12 project, a movement started by conservative talk radio host Glenn Beck, and applications with missions to make America a better place to live, statements that criticized how the country is being run, or groups focused on government spending, debt or taxes. The investigation ultimately found the Cincinnati office used inappropriate criteria to single out certain cases. Over the course of two years, 298 total cases were sent to D.C. for greater scrutiny. According to the investigation, 72 of those groups had the name tea party, 13 had Patriot and 11 had 9/12. The other 202 cases were listed as other. In 160 of these cases, the application remained open between 206 and 1,138 days, while 108 were approved. Democrats said 202 is a lot of other. And later it came out that the word progressive was also used to flag applications on another IRS Be on the Lookout list. Rep. Sandy Levin, D-Mich., the ranking member of the House Ways and Means committee asked Inspector General J. Russell George why he singled out all the mentions of conservative groups, but did not note in his investigation liberal groups were scrutinized as well. George replied that the investigation wasn’t only looking at which groups were flagged. Progressive groups were on a different lookout list that did not include instructions on how to refer cases that met the criteria. However, the lookout list for tea party groups did, and also resulted in delayed processing and unnecessary questioning of those groups, such as inquiries into their donors. George also noted that while 16 groups with progressive in the name showed up among the 298 cases, that represented just 30 percent of all progressive applications. That is in stark contrast to groups with tea party, patriot, or 9/12 in their name, of which 100 percent saw their applications held up. Finally, George said his investigation found multiple sources of information corroborating the use of tea party and other related criteria ... we found no indication in any of these other materials that ‘progressives’ was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention. So some progressive and liberal groups may have been flagged, and others may have ended up getting swept in the searches run by the Cincinnati office because their names had certain buzz words or phrases, but they didn’t get put through the ringer, at least on par with tea party groups. Our ruling Brazile said the IRS was looking at everybody including liberal groups and progressive groups. Yes, some progressive groups did have their tax-exempt status applications flagged as the IRS reviewed whether nonprofit groups were engaging in political activities. But it wasn’t to the same degree as tea party and other conservative groups, nor did it result in the same actions. The list targeting tea party groups resulted in delayed processing that in some cases lasted almost three years and inquiries into their donors. Further, the inspector general found tea party groups were systematically singled out as part of an office-wide effort, while progressive groups were not. Weighing all of this, we rate Brazile’s comments Half True.
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}