PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2012-08-28 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Did Samsung Pay a $1 Billion Judgment to Apple in Nickels? (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • In August 2012, the business and technology worlds were rocked by a decision in a patent infringement lawsuit which had a jury finding that Samsung, the world's largest maker of cell phones, had copied patented features of Apple's iPhone and iPad technologies in several of its products, and awarding Apple $1.05 billion in damages. Several days later, that decision was spoofed in a humor piece (translated from the original Spanish) positing that Samsung had paid off the award in nickels: Many readers who came across the article as it was circulated online mistook it for real news, even though the original and its most common reproductions were labeled as humor and satire. But even for those who encountered it out of context, several aspects of the story should have stood out as implausible: As to the hypothetical question of whether Apple would be obligated to accept payment of damages in such a form, since the late 19th century pennies and nickels have been considered legal tender and are therefore a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. (Businesses selling goods or services are not required by law to accept legal tender as payment, but this particular scenario involves payment of a debt rather than a purchase of goods or services.) (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url