|
?:reviewBody
|
-
The only good thing Mitt Romney had to say about President Barack Obama’s foreign policy record was he gave the order, and Seal Team Six took out Osama bin Laden. From that point in Romney’s speech accepting the Republican Party presidential nomination, he quickly pivoted to zinging Obama for his policies on Israel, Cuba, Russia, Poland and, possibly worst of all, Iran. On another front, every American is less secure today because he has failed to slow Iran's nuclear threat, Romney said on Aug. 30, 2012. In his first TV interview as president, he said we should talk to Iran. We're still talking, and Iran’s centrifuges are still spinning. Here, we’re fact-checking whether Obama said we should talk to Iran in his first TV interview. Obama’s first interview as president came on Jan. 27, 2009, with Hisham Melhem, Washington bureau chief for Al Arabiya. The Dubai-based network is considered less radical than Al Jazeera. News organizations from the New York Times to the Washington Post to MSNBC billed it as his first formal TV interview in the White House. Obama, who pledged a much different approach with the Middle East than his predecessor, was coming off selecting former Maine Sen. George Mitchell as special envoy to the Middle East. He made calls on his first day in the Oval Office to Arab and Israeli leaders, we’ve noted in a previous fact-check . My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy, the network quoted Obama as saying. The question about Iran’s nuclear status was the last one in the interview. Obama stressed diplomacy while frowning on Iran’s threats against Israel and its pursuit of a nuclear weapon that could potentially set off an arms race in the region. Here is the full exchange, pulled from Al Arabiya’s 2009 story : Melhem: Will the United States ever live with a nuclear Iran? And if not, how far are you going in the direction of preventing it? Obama: You know, I said during the campaign that it is very important for us to make sure that we are using all the tools of U.S. power, including diplomacy, in our relationship with Iran. Now, the Iranian people are a great people, and Persian civilization is a great civilization. Iran has acted in ways that's not conducive to peace and prosperity in the region: their threats against Israel; their pursuit of a nuclear weapon which could potentially set off an arms race in the region that would make everybody less safe; their support of terrorist organizations in the past -- none of these things have been helpful. But I do think that it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are, but where there are potential avenues for progress. And we will over the next several months be laying out our general framework and approach. And as I said during my inauguration speech, if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us. Again, we’re not evaluating in this fact-check whether Obama’s policies on Iran have worked to slow Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. But Obama said in his first presidential interview that we should be willing to talk to Iran. Romney’s characterization of that interview is very close. We rate his claim True.
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}