|
?:reviewBody
|
-
In the Sept. 22, 2011, Republican presidential debate, Rick Santorum called Rick Perry soft on illegal immigration, citing the Texas governor's continued support for a state law allowing some children of illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition at public colleges and universities. Also, Santorum said, Perry gave a speech in 2001 where he talked about binational health insurance between Mexico and Texas. I mean, I don't even think Barack Obama would be for binational health insurance. We wondered whether Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, was right in insinuating that Perry spoke in favor of binational health insurance in 2001. First, some background: Binational, or cross-border, health insurance refers to coverage that provides benefits in two countries or in a country other than the one in which an enrollee lives or works. California has been a leader in binational plans, according to a 2010 report by David Warner, a professor at the University of Texas LBJ School of Public Affairs. He told us in an interview that although plan specifics differ, the general idea is for U.S. employers to offer their workers a choice between receiving their health care services exclusively in Mexico or getting standard U.S.-based coverage. Workers may live and work in the United States or may live in Mexico and commute across the border to legally work on the U.S. side. Warner's report says that at least four U.S. insurers offer binational plans that allow enrollees to access networks of providers in Mexico. For example, Blue Shield of California's Access Baja option generally restricts enrollees, who must live within 50 miles of the California-Mexico border, to seeking care through providers in the Mexican border cities of Tijuana and Mexicali. Proponents say that because binational plans are cheaper than standard U.S. plans (primarily because health care is cheaper in Mexico), they make it easier for low-income workers to afford coverage. In Texas, the state Department of Insurance told us that it doesn't know of insurers offering cross-border plans. However, it's possible that some employers in the border area do — if they are self-funded, meaning they bear the financial responsibility and risks of coverage themselves. Such plans are not regulated by the agency. Texas proponents of binational plans have said they could help reduce the uninsured population in the state's border region. In 2010, 43 percent of border residents were uninsured, compared to 23 percent statewide, according to data from the Texas Department of State Health Services. Opponents have expressed concerns about the quality of care provided by Mexican health care providers and the inability of the state to monitor it. Back to Perry and his speech. According to an Aug. 31, 2011, Dallas Morning News blog post , Perry mentioned binational health insurance at an August 2001 summit on border issues. It was hosted by the University of Texas-Pan American in Edinburg, which is in the Rio Grande Valley about 10 miles from the Texas-Mexico border. According to news articles, the meeting brought together high-level government officials and business leaders from Mexico and the United States, including Norman Mineta, then the U.S. secretary of transportation. An Aug. 23, 2001, Morning News news article said panels at the summit weighed topics such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, water issues and border health concerns. Perry spoke to the gathering on Aug. 22, 2001. According to the text of his remarks, posted on his state website, he was upbeat about increased cooperation and trade between the United States and Mexico. And he called for the two nations to work together to solve shared problems. Perry then touched on infrastructure, trade and water issues before focusing on health care. He singled out several problems in border areas, including a lack of preventive care and the limited availability of medical specialists. We have much to gain if we work together to expand preventative care and treat maladies unique to this region, Perry said. Perry next said a legislative proposal by then-state Rep. Pat Haggerty, R-El Paso, and state Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr., D-Brownsville, establishes an important study that will look at the feasibility of binational health insurance. This study recognizes that the Mexican and U.S. sides of the border compose one region, and we must address health care problems throughout that region. Lucy Nashed, a spokeswoman in the governor’s office, confirmed that Perry's mention of a binational health insurance study referred to a bill passed during the 2001 legislative session that created a committee to assess the health care needs of the border area and the affordability, cost-effectiveness, economic impact, and improved health status achievable through binational health benefit plan coverage. Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for Perry's presidential campaign, said the study ultimately concluded there were numerous barriers to accomplishing binational health insurance, and the Legislature took no further action on this concept. The January 2003 report by the Interim Committee on Binational Health Benefit Plan Coverage, first discusses health care concerns in the Texas border region and California's experience with binational health insurance. It then lays out cost savings that binational insurance plans were projected to generate in Texas, as well as legal and practical impediments to implementing them. The report closes with 10 scenarios for moving forward if the Legislature determines that binational health plans are a viable option to provide affordable health plans. The scenarios range from changing state law covering health maintenance organizations to allow for binational options to setting up a pilot project that would allow the plans to be offered in one part of the border region. In 2007, Sen. Lucio and Rep. Jose Menendez, D-San Antonio, introduced proposals to allow for the offering and regulating of cross border health benefit plans covering medical services within 75 miles of either side of the border. Those measures died. We asked Perry's campaign whether he favors binational health plan options for border residents and received no response. Separately, we reviewed news accounts and other Perry speeches and statements for signs that Perry talked up binational health insurance before or after his 2001 speech. We found one earlier reference, in an Aug. 6, 2001, editorial on the governor’s state website describing how legislation passed during that year's session would help the border region. Perry highlighted the same bill that led to the 2003 report: We further addressed health care needs through House Bill 2498, which establishes an interim study to provide recommendations for the development of affordable and accessible health care coverage — including the possibility of bi-national health care coverage — along the Texas-Mexico border region. Earlier in 2001, Perry vetoed a measure calling for state health officials to develop a statewide strategic health plan, including an examination of how increased trade with Mexico had affected the border region. In a statement , Perry said one reason for the veto was the failure to include a binational approach to developing the plan. Effective solutions should also involve the cooperation and the commitment of Mexico, Perry said. Our ruling Perry talked about binational health insurance in a 2001 speech, as Santorum said. However, his dig about Perry's mention wrongly implies that the governor is working to establish binational health insurance. We found no evidence of Perry taking further action in the 10 years since. We rate Santorum's statement Half True. To comment on this ruling, like us on Facebook .
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}