PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2021-02-13 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Did Scientists Agree on the Worst Fast Food Chain? (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • Fast food rumors are fairly popular in the online news world. Over the years, we've covered a number of claims about restaurants such as McDonald's, Wendy's, and Taco Bell. So when an online advertisement claimed that scientists agreed on the worst fast food chain, we decided to take a closer look. The ad in question read: [Gallery] Avoid This Fast Food Chain at All Costs - Scientists Agree It's the Worst. Readers who clicked the ad were led to a lengthy slideshow article on Definition.org. The story spanned 25 pages. Its headline read: Worst Fast Food Restaurants, Ranked. The article appeared to be anything but based on science: Scientists did not agree on the worst fast food chain. Nowhere in the story were scientists even mentioned. There also appeared to be no data-driven method that was employed to create the list. The line about scientists might remind some readers of the old doctors hate him trope that was also used in lots of ads. The clickbait article appeared to be nothing more than 25 uneventful pages of the worst fast food chains. They included mention of Dairy Queen, Subway, Taco Bell, and 22 other restaurants. On each page was a review from a single customer who had a bad experience at one location for each restaurant. The story's headline claimed that the list was ranked. On the first page was Arby's, while the last page featured McDonald's. However, it was unclear if the list of the worst fast food chains was supposed to be ascending or descending. It was not numbered. In sum, there was no evidence that scientists agreed on the worst fast food chain. The misleading ad led to 25 pages of negative restaurant reviews. Scientists weren't even mentioned. We rate this claim False. (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url