|
?:reviewBody
|
-
The increased attention focused a Republican-sponsored Congressional bill targeting masked protesters was misrepresented by at least one disreputable website that overstated its implications. On 12 July 2018, Neon Nettle published an article claiming that Republican congressman Dan Donovan's proposed HR 6054 bill (known as the Unmasking Antifa Act of 2018) had made it illegal for people to join Antifa, the catch-all name for various groups who engage in demonstrations against white nationalist and fascist groups: In reality, the as-yet-unpassed bill, which was introduced to the House of Representatives on 8 June 2018, addresses public behavior (primarily committing certain offenses while in disguise), not allegiance or membership with any particular group: Law enforcement officers, however, are not subject to the ban and may cover their faces while performing their duties at protests. Americans have the natural right to speak and protest freely; it is not a right to throw Molotov cocktails and beat people who assemble peacefully while hiding behind a mask, Donovan said in defense of the bill on Twitter. My bill adds a penalty for doing so to the decades-old civil rights statutes. Nothing in the bill specifically precludes individuals from joining a group or movement related to Antifa (who sometimes don black clothing and masks), just as it doesn't specifically criminalize joining organizations such as Ku Klux Klan (who are also known for appearing in public wearing identity-obscuring garb). The bill seeks to provide penalty enhancements for those who threaten or harm others while masked or disguised, regardless of any group membership. Moreover, HR 6054 hasn't even yet been brought to a vote yet, much less passed by Congress and signed into law, so asserting (as Neon Nettle did) that any activity referenced in that bill is now illegal is putting the cart well before the horse. Antifa is a loose collection of autonomous groups, networks, and individuals, not a discrete, centrally run organization. Anyone can claim to be antifa, and no authority regulates or controls what various entities calling themselves antifa may or may not do. As such, it would be extremely difficult to ban anyone from joining something so amorphous in nature. The Neon Nettle story also injected a common trope among conspiracy theorists by name-dropping George Soros, the Hungarian-American billionaire who has also been accused of funding gun-safety protesters and putting money directly into the hands of protesters against extrajudicial killings by police. Antifa have become a popular scapegoat for various right-wing opponents, who have attempted to link them to mass shooting attacks, falsely accuse them of committing gang-style attacks, or otherwise portray them as being just as prone to violence as white nationalists. However, political experts have questioned that characterization of antifa, pointing out that those tagged with that name are far less violent than the right-wing contingents they oppose, as recorded in an Anti-Defamation League report on extremism:
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}