|
?:reviewBody
|
-
Example: [Collected via e-mail, October 2015] Origins: Shortly after Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin told his fellow House Republicans on 20 October 2015 that he wouldn't run for the Speaker of the House position unless they assured him that the job wouldn't take away from his family time, a meme criticizing the congressman began circulating on social media, claiming that Ryan had worked only 97 days in 2014: The claim that Paul Ryan only worked 97 days in 2014 likely stems from a The New York Times report published on 5 January 2014 about how the do-nothing congress was scheduled to do even less that year. While subsequent reports claimed that the House held only 97 sessions in 2014, the Times report actually stated that Congress was scheduled to be in session 97 days between the date of that article's publication (in January 2014) and the upcoming mid-term elections in November 2014: Although the Times article stated that the House was scheduled to be in session for 112 days altogether in 2014, Congress.gov recorded that the House actually had 135 legislative days in 2014. Either way, it's clear that the House was in session for more than 97 days in 2014. It's also a fallacy to maintain that members of Congress are only working on days when Congress is in session. In addition to attending sessions, members of Congress have numerous other duties that occupy their out of session days: The claim that Paul Ryan only worked 97 days in 2014 is based on two pieces of misinformation. First, that the house was only in session for 97 days in 2014, and second, that the number of work days for a member of Congress is equal to the number of days that Congress is in session.
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}