?:reviewBody
|
-
Millions of people who voted Leave did not vote for Theresa May’s hard Brexit. We can’t know for certain. More recent polling could be used to show this—if being against a hard Brexit is defined as prioritising free trade over immigration control. There were also millions of people who voted Leave but did not vote for Theresa May's hard Brexit Jo Swinson, 27 April 2017 There has been lots of commentary on who voted for each side in the EU referendum and why. We’re focusing specifically here on people’s expectations in relation to a ‘hard Brexit’, as Ms Swinson referred to. The term hard Brexit means different things to different people, but it’s generally used to mean at the very least leaving the EU’s single market (as Ms Swinson referred to). Theresa May has said this is the only way to control things like immigration. EU officials say this as well. This is because EU free trade rules for the single market require free movement of people between member countries. At the start of the year a majority of both Remain and Leave voters said they wanted both free trade and immigration control, says an in-depth study by polling expert Professor John Curtice. The disagreement comes in what voters prioritise. Faced with a choice over whether free trade or immigration control comes first, as many as 36% of Leave supporters said they would ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ maintain freedom of movement in return for free trade, compared to 74% of Remain voters, at least when confronted out of the blue by a pollster. At least half of Remain voters were found to back some policies that the research defined as parts of a hard Brexit as well. This is all debatable. There is no set definition of a hard and soft Brexit, and we don’t yet know what the trade offs will be during the negotiations. What this polling does show is that we should beware of making strong claims about what voters on either side think: there are Remainers sympathising with Leave positions, and Leavers sympathising with Remain positions. For a broader examination of the reasons behind voters’ decisions last June, social researchers at NatCen have published extensive analysis. Update 28 June 2017 We updated the wording of the piece to make it clearer and to emphasise the limitations of what the polling is able to tell us.
(en)
|