|
?:reviewBody
|
-
Research shows African Americans face harsher treatment than whites in the criminal justice system, including longer prison sentences. A Facebook post tries to illustrate that point through a graphic comparing the results of two cases overseen by the same judge. The post compares the case of Chase Legleitner, a white 19-year-old, with Lamar Lloyd, a black 21-year-old. It says that Legleitner was sentenced to two years in jail while Lloyd was sentenced to 26 years in prison — both by Circuit Court Judge Sherwood Bauer Jr. in the 19th Circuit in Martin County. The claim gets the basic facts correct, but it omits an additional difference in the white defendant’s case. The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook .) A similar graphic has circulated at least since 2018 . This claim was also shared by various celebrities commenting on racial injustice in June following the death of George Floyd in police custody. Meme stems from ‘Bias on the Bench’ series The juxtaposition of the two robbery cases is from the Sarasota Herald-Tribune’s award-winning 2016 Bias on the Bench series . The newspaper examined millions of court documents on crimes in Florida from 2004 through 2016. The investigation concluded that blacks are more likely to be found guilty than whites and usually get longer sentences. One article used the sentences for Legleitner and Lloyd as an example to show that Bauer sentenced African Americans to longer terms. Bauer told the newspaper that race is of complete insignificance in his treatment of defendants. Here are the basic facts of the two cases: Legleitner robbed men in a 2008 drug deal. Lloyd robbed a Pizza Hut and gas station the following year. Both men pleaded no contest to two counts of armed robbery and had open pleas, which means they weren’t promised a particular sentence. Each had a single misdemeanor on his record and tallied the same point total on scoresheets used to determine incarceration time. Based on their score of 138 points, the state’s guidelines called for a sentence of just under seven years to life in prison. Bauer sentenced Lloyd to 26 years in prison in 2010, and the following year sentenced Legleitner to about two years in jail, including time already served. Cooperation with prosecutors was a factor David Lustgarten, the assistant state attorney who prosecuted Legleitner, told PolitiFact that the defendants’ point totals on the scoresheet don’t tell the full story. Lustgarten said he was familiar with the facts of Lloyd’s case. Legleitner, he said, was one of about a half dozen defendants who were involved in a scheme to approach other men under the guise of buying drugs, but planned to rob them. Legleitner helped the prosecution build the case against the co-defendants who were armed, including testifying against one at trial. I told Judge Bauer at sentencing that without his testimony I would have never secured a conviction against the two bad actors, Lustgarten said. The Herald-Tribune article alluded to the fact that Legleitner cooperated when it stated that the prosecutor lobbied hard for leniency. Legleitner’s defense attorney didn’t respond to our questions. Lloyd’s case involved fewer defendants. Lloyd’s was a clear-cut case, said Adam Guzi, who prosecuted Lloyd and recommended a 30-year sentence. Guzi said he had witness accounts from the Pizza Hut and the Sunoco gas station as well as another witness who had spotted the defendants appearing to inspect another restaurant earlier. Prosecutors didn’t need Lloyd’s cooperation to convict the other man, Guzi said. Lloyd’s defense attorney, J.D. Lewis IV, said he thought that his client’s sentence was outrageous at the time. But asked about the role of race in Lloyd’s sentencing, he told PolitiFact, I can’t personally say there is evidence that race was a factor. In general though, Lewis said he believes that there are racial disparities in the criminal-justice system. I would be naive to think racism does not play a part in the criminal justice system, he said. Following the Herald-Tribune’s series, the 12th judicial circuit wrote a rebuttal , which included an analysis of the two robbery cases handled by Bauer in the 19th circuit. Bauer’s office directed us to part of the rebuttal written by Diamond Litty, public defender for the 19th circuit (Legleitner and Lloyd both had private counsel.) The public defender pointed to Lustgarten’s testimony at the sentencing hearing that Legleitner was morally cooperative, honest, forthright, and remorseful. The public defender also noted that Legleitner stole from someone who was a drug user or dealer, while Lloyd stole from employees at work. Scoresheets don’t pick up differences We sent a summary of our findings to Marc Mauer, executive director of the Sentencing Project, a criminal justice advocacy group. Mauer questioned why states have a complex scoring system in their sentencing guidelines if it doesn’t pick up significant case distinctions. In this case, essentially the black defendant gets sentenced by the guidelines system and the white defendant gets the benefit of wide-ranging judicial discretion, he said. This doesn't necessarily mean that the white defendant ‘got off too easy’— just as likely that the black defendant got punished too severely. Prosecutors have long recommended a reduced sentence in exchange for a defendant’s cooperation, Mauer said. But in the era of mandatory sentences and enhanced prosecutorial power, the scale of that benefit has increased dramatically. So defendants who don't have information to trade or wish to contest the charges are faced with the prospect of a dramatically higher sentence for the same conduct as another who chooses to plead guilty, he said. A 2000 research report by the National Institute of Justice , a federal agency, concluded that despite decades of reform efforts, in some jurisdictions, blacks and Hispanics received longer sentences or differential benefits from guideline departures than similarly situated white offenders. The disparities appeared in Southern and non-Southern jurisdictions, in state and federal court systems, and in jurisdictions with and without sentencing guidelines. Our ruling A Facebook post said a white armed robbery suspect was sentenced to two years in jail while a black armed robbery suspect was sentenced to 26 years in prison by the same Florida judge in two separate cases. The post gets the basic facts correct: The two defendants both pleaded no contest to the same crime, both had one prior misdemeanor and both scored the same number of points on a system designed to calculate their sentences. But prosecutors said the white defendant got a reduced sentence after cooperating with prosecutors to convict co-defendants, a fact that’s not mentioned in the graphic. We rate this claim Mostly True.
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}