PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2021-11-24 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • you need to have evidence and lay it out. I can't lay it out. A NATO submarine. And it was there (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • On November 22, Russia’s RIA Novosti state news agency published an interview with Vyacheslav Popov, the former admiral of Russia’s Northern Fleet, about the disastrous sinking of the Kursk submarine, which occurred during his tenure in August 2000.Popov’s rehashing of this conspiracy theory comes as Russia-NATO relations have hit a new low. Apart from tensions over Russia’s actions in and around Ukraine since 2014, Russia’s ally Belarus has set off a crisis with its neighbors Lithuania and Poland by attempting to push migrants across the other countries’ borders. Meanwhile, as many as 100,000 Russian troops have been deployed near the borders of Ukraine with no stated purpose or scheduled exercise to explain the presence. Popov claimed the Russian nuclear-powered submarine sank in the Barents Sea after colliding with a NATO submarine belonging either to the United States Navy or the British Royal Navy."The submarine which collided with the Kursk was following the Kursk, apparently, but was unable to ensure safety in those sea conditions and all other conditions, it got too close, or the Kursk's maneuvering led to a loss of contact, Popov told RIA Novosti. "I know the name of it with a 90% probability (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url