PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2020-11-24 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Misleading claim circulates online that Philippine Supreme Court justice has been 'removed' from participating in poll dispute case (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • A video has been viewed hundreds of thousands of times on YouTube and in multiple online posts which claim it shows that a Philippine Supreme Court justice has been removed from participating in a vice presidential poll dispute case. The claim is misleading; on November 17, 2020, the court denied the motion to inhibit the Supreme Court justice from participating in the case; the video in the misleading posts quotes a news report that in fact only states motions have been filed asking the court to compel the Supreme Court justice not to participate in the poll case. The six-minute, 22-second video was posted here on YouTube on November 8, 2020. It has been viewed more than 230,000 times. A screenshot of the misleading post, taken on November 11, 2020 The video’s Tagalog-language title translates to English as: THIS IS SHOCKING: CALIDA HAS REMOVED LEONEN After DEFRAUDING MARCOS and LETTING ROBREDO WIN! Calida refers to Philippine Solicitor General Jose Calida . Leonen refers to Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvic Leonen , who took charge of a poll protest against Vice President Leni Robredo filed by her losing opponent in the 2016 election, Bongbong Marcos. An identical video was also shared alongside a similar claim here and here on Facebook; and in this blog post. The claim, however, is misleading. From the one-minute 39-second mark, the video shows this report published by Philippine newspaper The Manila Times, which does not state Leonen has been removed from participating in the poll case. The report, dated November 9, 2020, reads in part: The Solicitor General and former senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will join forces on Monday in asking the Supreme Court, sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal, to bar Justice Marvic Mario Victor Leonen from participating in deliberations on the election protest filed by Marcos. According to well-placed sources of The Manila Times, Solicitor General Jose Calida and Marcos will file a motion compelling Leonen to inhibit from the case. Leonen is the ponente for the case. On November 17, 2020, the Supreme Court announced it decided to deny the motion that would have prevented Leonen from participating in the poll dispute case. The court statement reads: The Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) today unanimously resolved to: 1.) deny the Motions to Inhibit separately filed by Protestant Ferdinand Bongbong R. Marcos and the Solicitor General; and 2.) direct the Solicitor General and Mr. Jomar Canlas, reporter of the Manila Times, to show cause why they should not be cited in contempt. The resolution can be challenged within 15 days. (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url