PropertyValue
?:author
?:datePublished
  • 2019-11-12 (xsd:date)
?:headline
  • Another flawed cost of Corbyn figure from the Conservatives (en)
?:inLanguage
?:itemReviewed
?:mentions
?:reviewBody
  • Jeremy Corbyn will cost every British worker £2,400 per year. This figure is largely meaningless as the calculations and assumptions behind it have a number of flaws. The true 'cost of Corbyn': £2,400 a year for every British worker, claim Tories The Telegraph, 12 November 2019 The Conservatives have claimed that every taxpayer in the UK will have an additional bill of £2,400 per year under Labour. But problems with the calculation make this claim largely meaningless. They estimated the total cost of Labour’s policies over five years, and then estimated that, of that sum, £374 billion would not be covered by Labour’s previous pledges on additional borrowing or taxes. They call this a £374 billion funding black hole which taxpayers will have to cover, and claim it translates into a cost of £2,400 per income tax payer per year, over five years. But, as we’ve already said, the Conservatives’ estimate of the total cost of Labour’s policies has serious problems. They can’t know what the Labour party’s policies will cost because Labour hasn’t released its 2019 election manifesto yet and we don’t know exactly what all its policies will be. The Conservatives’ calculation includes a number of policies that Labour hasn’t so far said will be in its manifesto, and one which it has ruled out. Other calculations made by the Conservatives seem overstated, either by double counting costs or assuming Labour would introduce the fully-fledged policy from day one, rather than phasing it in. Because this £2,400 a year figure is derived from that larger estimate, it suffers from the same flaws. Those problems aside, it’s not possible to convert the supposed £374 billion funding black hole into a uniform cost of £2,400 for every one of the UK’s 31 million income tax payers, as the Conservatives have done. That’s because if Labour had to raise this extra revenue, it wouldn’t be obliged to do it through income tax. It could, for example, look at corporation tax or VAT instead, which would still be a cost but to different groups and spread out unevenly. And even if it raised the revenue through higher income tax, higher earners pay more income tax—meaning they would pay more than lower earners. BBC Reality Check also points out that the Conservatives’ assumptions about Labour’s tax-raising plans rely on documents which Labour has not formally adopted as party policy. (en)
?:reviewRating
rdf:type
?:url