|
?:reviewBody
|
-
In December 2020, U.S. President-elect Joe Biden named Pete Buttigieg, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and former Democratic presidential primary candidate, as his nominee for the position of transportation secretary. The announcement prompted a wave of news articles reporting that Buttigieg, who is a gay man, would become the first openly LGBT Cabinet member in United States history if his appointment is confirmed by the Senate. However, internet users mocked LGBT publication Queerty for describing Buttigieg in those terms after screenshots of an earlier tweet appeared to show the website using similar words to describe Richard Grenell, former acting director of national intelligence (DNI) under outgoing President Donald Trump. On Dec. 15, Caleb Hull shared two screenshots of tweets by Queerty, along with the dry observation 'Journalism.' The tweet shown on the left was dated Feb. 20, 2020, and read, Trump makes Richard Grenell first openly gay cabinet secretary in history. The tweet shown on the right was dated Dec. 15, 2020, and read, Pete Buttigieg makes history as first out cabinet member: Both tweets were authentic, and Hull therefore correctly attributed each of them to Queerty. The tweet relating to Grenell's appointment can be found here and included a link to a Queerty article that further described Grenell as the first openly gay man to hold a cabinet position. The tweet relating to Buttigieg's nomination can be found here and included a link to an article on Queerty's sister site LGBTQ Nation that reported Buttigieg will be the first out gay person to be a member of the presidential Cabinet. Queerty, therefore, did indeed report in February 2020 that Grenell was the first openly gay Cabinet secretary in history, before later describing Buttigieg as the first out Cabinet member. Those are mutually incompatible statements. On Nov. 9, Greg Price highlighted a similar contradictory set of statements by another LGBT publication, Pink News: Those tweets were also authentic, and can be viewed here and here. A dispute has arisen over whether Grenell should be considered a Cabinet member. On Dec. 16, Queerty itself wrote scathingly of the claim — made by Queerty and others — that Grenell was the first openly gay cabinet member: LGBTQ Nation, in reporting on Buttigieg's nomination for Transport Secretary, drew the same distinction, writing that: By convention, the DNI is treated as a Cabinet-level or Cabinet-rank position, and the person who occupies that role takes part in Cabinet meetings. The DNI is responsible for reporting directly to the president on matters of national security and intelligence and effectively oversees and integrates the work of the federal agencies that make up the intelligence community. As such, it has grown to become a position of considerable power and influence within the executive branch of the U.S. government. However, the DNI does not oversee what is known as an executive department (such as the Treasury Department, Defense Department, and so on, which are led by Cabinet secretaries, with the exception of the Justice Department, which the attorney general heads). Similarly, the law that created the role of the DNI does not define it as being a Cabinet position, and the DNI is not listed as one of the 15 Cabinet members in the official order of presidential succession contained in the Succession Act. Thus the claim that the DNI is a Cabinet member appears to be a weakly supported one, and Queerty's claim in February 2020 that Grenell was, specifically, a Cabinet secretary was certainly inaccurate. That Grenell only ever served as acting DNI, and his appointment was never confirmed by the Senate (a requirement prescribed in the law that created the position of DNI), further weakens the claim that Grenell, in particular, was a Cabinet member and therefore the claim that he was the first-ever openly gay Cabinet member. Nonetheless, Grenell's appointment as acting DNI was not only historic in formal terms but was especially meaningful in light of the erstwhile treatment of LGBT people within the American intelligence community, who were for many decades regarded, without evidentiary basis, as a blackmail risk and excluded from the intelligence community. As the Brookings Institute's James Kirchik wrote in March:
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}