|
?:reviewBody
|
-
An image of Earth was pasted into a photo from the Apollo 17 space mission. This is not true and is a misinterpretation of an effect linked to photo editing software. A famous photo of Earth published in 2002 is a composite image or photoshop. It also pastes copies of clouds across the surface. The image from 2002 is a composite image but made up of thousands of files worth of real data. The image’s creator said clouds in some places were duplicated but it is not a cover-up or hoax. Clouds don’t move in NASA footage of Earth rotating. This is further proof of a cloud map, used across a number of NASA images. The video used to make this point is not fast enough for us to perceive the movement of clouds. Movement can be seen in faster versions of the video. A video on Instagram suggests that a number of images of the Earth from space have been altered or faked by NASA. The video, taken from a much longer interview with conspiracy theorist Dave Murphy, presents four images produced by NASA which he claims are proof that photos and film taken by the space programme are either made-up or manipulated. These include an image from the Apollo 17 space mission, a composite image of the Earth produced in 2002 and a video of the Earth rotating. These claims are all incorrect. Stay informed Be first in line for the facts – get our free weekly email Subscribe The first photo shown is from the 1972 Apollo 17 lunar mission of astronaut Harrrison Jack Schmitt with a view of the Earth in the moon’s sky. In the Instagram video, Mr Murphy says when you drop the saturation and the levels in the photo you can see a rectangular box around the image of the Earth, proving it has been pasted in. This is not the case. The rectangle around the Earth in the image is almost certainly the result of data being lost in low quality images and leading to pixelation (when a photo lacks the information to create smooth curves around objects within it, creating a blurry or boxy appearance around edges). To test this we altered low and high quality versions of the same photo using the same instructions in the Instagram video. We found the rectangular box effect only occurred when we manipulated the low quality photos, strongly suggesting the box around the Earth is simply pixelation. Mr Murphy then presents another NASA image of the Earth (Blue Marble), claiming it’s a composite image made in Photoshop and that whoever created the image got lazy and used a clone tool to copy and paste the same sections of cloud across the Earth repeatedly. Some of what he says is partly correct. The image is a composite, as acknowledged by its creator Robert Simmon. It is a representation of a number of different images of the Earth stitched together over four months. The clouds were added based on 200 satellite scenes. All this information was then mapped onto a sphere to create the appearance of a globe. Mr Simmon also said while some of the clouds were cloned it was because there are gaps between orbits near the equator, and there's no way to fill them with real data. The Instagram video finishes with an animation of the Earth, taken from images of the Galileo space probe. Mr Murphy notes none of the clouds in the animation move over the course of 25 hours, later suggesting they may also have been duplicated in another set of satellite images. The only reason they don’t appear to move, however, is because of the speed of the image. The animation (created using images taken by the probe in 1990) shows that in real-time, and even sped up 600 times beyond that, the clouds don’t seem to move. This is only because the speed of the image means cloud movement is not perceptible. However at 3,600 times the speed of real-time, both the Earth’s rotation and the clouds can be clearly seen. This article is part of our work fact checking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as false headline because these claims about NASA images are largely incorrect and aren’t evidence all NASA images are ‘faked’.
(en)
|
![[This page as RDF]](http://data.gesis.org/claimskg/static/rdf-icon.gif){kind=icon}